On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:58:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 14:40 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 13:34 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > > > What should I do with this in the short term? Leave it in > > > ppc-for-2.8, or remove it for now pending possible changes? > > > > I think I'm still measuring a performance improvement with this, I'll > > test a bit more and will get back to you. > > > > It will definitely better to do it without a helper once Richard's 128- > > bit stuff is in. > > Ok, after I nice'd myself on top of all the gcc's on that test machine > I confirm that this patch is a loss on qemu-user. It might still be a > win for qemu-system-ppc64 due to the translation but probably not > worth bothering. > > So drop this one. I'll use the 128-bit support when it becomes > available.
Done.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
