* Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, > > > > Well the crash of guest phys bits > host phys bits, should be easy to > > > reproduce by booting a 65GB guest on a 64GB RAM + 2GB swap host with > > > 36 host phys bits using the upstream qemu that forces the guest phys > > > bits to 40. > > > > So you supply more RAM than host can address, and guest crashes? > > Yep. The only reason we don't see this happening in practice is that > it's probably next to impossible to find a machine which has (a) only 36 > physical address lines and (b) allows to plug that much RAM. > > > Why are we worried about it? > > It's more a issue with pci ressources. In theory seabios/edk2 could go > figure how big the physical address space is, then map 64bit pci bars as > high as possible, thereby making stuff like etc/reserved-memory-end in > fw_cfg unnecessary. > > But with qemu saying 40 phys bits are available even if they are not > this approach isn't going to fly ...
Something somewhere in qemu/ kernel/ firmware is already reading the number of physical bits to determine PCI mapping; if I do: ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,accel=kvm,usb=off -m 4096,slots=16,maxmem=128T -vga none -device qxl-vga,bus=pcie.0,ram_size_mb=2048,vram64_size_mb=2048 -vnc 0.0.0.0:0 /home/vms/7.2a.qcow2 -chardev stdio,mux=on,id=mon -mon chardev=mon,mode=readline -cpu host,phys-bits=48 it will happily map the qxl VRAM right up high, but if I lower the phys-bits down to 46 it won't. VGA controller: PCI device 1b36:0100 IRQ 11. BAR0: 32 bit memory at 0xc0000000 [0xdfffffff]. BAR1: 32 bit memory at 0xe0000000 [0xe3ffffff]. BAR2: 32 bit memory at 0xe4070000 [0xe4071fff]. BAR3: I/O at 0xc080 [0xc09f]. BAR4: 64 bit prefetchable memory at 0x800480000000 [0x8004ffffffff]. BAR6: 32 bit memory at 0xffffffffffffffff [0x0000fffe]. id "" I'll admit to not understanding why it all still boots and doesn't fall in a mess with that mapping (46 bit Xeon). Dave > > cheers, > Gerd > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK