On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:04:14PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:14:14PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:28:59AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is the next version of the CPU hotplug patchset for PowerPC > > > sPAPR target. The hotplug semantics looks like this: > > > > > > (qemu) device_add POWER8E-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] > > > (qemu) device_add host-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] > > > (qemu) device_add > > > POWER8E_v2.1-spapr-cpu-core,id=core2,core-id=16[,threads=4] > > > > I've merged these to my ppc-cpu-hotplug branch, and I'm doing some > > testing. It it checks out, I hope to send a pull request. > > I've now merged this into my main ppc-for-2.7 branch. I'll be doing > some testing, obviously, but I'd certain appreciate any other tests of > this branch with the hotplug code.
David, I don't see the unplug patch in your tree, intentional ? Also I am working on supporting the CPU compat settings with the following semantics: -cpu host,power7 -device host-spapr-cpu-core,compat-cpu=power7 Whatever CPU compat level that is specifed with -cpu host is considered as base and the compat-cpu property specified with -device will be validated against the base compat level. And this property 'compat-cpu' will be supported only for host-spapr-cpu-core type. Is this semantics fine ? Regards, Bharata.
