On Thu, 06/02 03:04, Wei, Jiangang wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 15:23 +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 06/01 15:08, Wei Jiangang wrote:
> > > Use a single error_printf to replace triple error_report.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Jiangang <weijg.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/raw-posix.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c b/block/raw-posix.c
> > > index a4f5a1b..141b01a 100644
> > > --- a/block/raw-posix.c
> > > +++ b/block/raw-posix.c
> > > @@ -2061,11 +2061,11 @@ static bool setup_cdrom(char *bsd_path, Error
> > > **errp)
> > > /* Prints directions on mounting and unmounting a device */
> > > static void print_unmounting_directions(const char *file_name)
> > > {
> > > - error_report("If device %s is mounted on the desktop, unmount"
> > > - " it first before using it in QEMU", file_name);
> > > - error_report("Command to unmount device: diskutil unmountDisk %s",
> > > - file_name);
> > > - error_report("Command to mount device: diskutil mountDisk %s",
> > > file_name);
> > > + error_printf("If device %s is mounted on the desktop, unmount"
> > > + " it first before using it in QEMU\n"
> > > + "Command to unmount device: diskutil unmountDisk %s\n"
> > > + "Command to mount device: diskutil mountDisk %s\n",
> > > + file_name, file_name, file_name);
> >
> > I'd say it's less readable with a worse alignment to the parameters.
> Hi, Fam
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> You mean every error_report() followed by file_name is more readable ?
> or my codes dosen't follow a good alignment format？
>
I'm happy with either way. :)
Fam
