Am 17.05.2016 um 11:15 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> We should check for (res & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) only. The situation when we
> will have !(res & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) and will not have BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO is
> not possible.
The patch is okay, but I'm correcting this paragraph into:
We should check for (res & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) only. The situation when we
will have !(res & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) and will not have BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO is
not possible for images with bdi.unallocated_blocks_are_zero == true.
For those images where it's false, however, it can happen and we must
not consider the data zeroed then or we would corrupt the image.
Kevin
