On 13/05/2016 19:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:53:46PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The memory-mapped interface cannot express x2APIC destinations that are
>> a result of remapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> index bee85e469477..d10064289551 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>> #include "hw/boards.h"
>> #include "hw/i386/x86-iommu.h"
>> +#include "hw/i386/apic_internal.h"
>>
>> /*#define DEBUG_INTEL_IOMMU*/
>> #ifdef DEBUG_INTEL_IOMMU
>> @@ -268,24 +269,33 @@ static void vtd_update_iotlb(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>> uint16_t source_id,
>> g_hash_table_replace(s->iotlb, key, entry);
>> }
>>
>> +static void apic_deliver_msi(MSIMessage *msi)
>> +{
>> + /* Conjure apic-bound msi delivery out of thin air. */
>> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
>> + APICCommonState *apic_state = APIC_COMMON(cpu->apic_state);
>> + APICCommonClass *apic_class = APIC_COMMON_GET_CLASS(apic_state);
>
> I see a pattern here:
>
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c-static void do_vapic_enable(void *data)
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c-{
> [...]
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c- X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
> [...]
> hw/i386/kvmvapic.c: apic_enable_vapic(cpu->apic_state, s->vapic_paddr);
> [...]
Here first_cpu is just the CPU that do_vapic_enable is being called on
(via run_on_cpu). So this one can use the posted patch that passes a
CPUState* to run_on_cpu callbacks.
> hw/i386/pc.c-static void pic_irq_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
> hw/i386/pc.c-{
> hw/i386/pc.c- CPUState *cs = first_cpu;
> hw/i386/pc.c- X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> [...]
> hw/i386/pc.c: if (cpu->apic_state) {
> [...]
>
>
> Time to write a common pc_get_first_apic() helper, or provide a
> PCMachineState::first_apic field?
For this one, we could add a pc_get_apic_class() helper that returns
NULL if there is no APIC on the first_cpu. It wouldn't be a change for
this code and would be nicer for Radim's use case.
Paolo
