Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovga...@ispras.ru> writes: >> From: mttcg-requ...@listserver.greensocs.com >> [mailto:mttcg-requ...@listserver.greensocs.com] >> On 12/04/16 15:50, KONRAD Frederic wrote: >> >> Yes, but users may like to have an option to disable MTTCG for some >> >> reason. I'm also concerned about icount mode: not sure how to account >> >> virtual time when all vCPUs run in parallel. >> > >> > I'm thinking the same, we don't have a solution for icount yet. >> > The reverse execution support is probably badly broken as well. >> >> Reverse execution doesn't even seem to support more than a single core. >> As of icount, it looks like to be incompatible with MTTCG. > > It doesn't, because there is no multicore support for tcg yet. > I think, that we have to find some solution for icount (even if it > will be slow).
Well one of the reasons I'm keeping single thread behaviour is so things like icount/replay support can continue to work. The two options will be incompatible to start with. I'm also expecting people will want to rule out mttcg as a problem at least in the early days. -- Alex Bennée
