Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:04 +0200 > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200 >> > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> > I still don't see the need for MIGRATION_STARTED, it could be useful in >> >> > the target but I'd like to understand the use case in more detail. >> >> >> >> At this point, if you are doing migration with tcp, and you are putting >> >> the wrong port on source (no path or any other error), you get no info >> >> at all of what is happening. >> > >> > Shouldn't the migrate command just the return the expected error? >> >> No. Think you are "having troubles". You try to find what happens. >> launch things by hand. And there is no way to know if anybody has >> conected to the destination machine. Some notification that migration >> has started is _very_ useful. expecially when there are >> networks/firewalls/... in the middle. > > [...] > >> That is it. But you continue telling that going to the old house and >> doing a info migrate is a good interface. > > I'm sorry? When did I ever claimed such a thing?
polling is enough. polling has to be done in source machine. > First point: all you describe is MIGRATION_CONNECTED, at the end of the day > it would do exactly what you want for MIGRATION_STARTED. > > The second, and most important point, is that we're trying not to make > things worse. Adding a number of events to circumvent a bad designed > command and having the wrong expectations (ie. help developer debugging) > is a clear recipe for disaster. > > Anyway, I think it doesn't matter anymore, as QMP is not going to be declared > stable for 0.13. In this case we'll have enough time to design the proper > interface. > >> To add insult to injury, the problem is that libvirt people are not >> collaborative, and expect things that can't be done, are uncooperative, > > Again, I've never claimed that and I think you're taking this thread to > the wrong direction. Ok, I stop then. Later, Juan.
