On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Stefan Weil wrote:
This should go in asap, it breaks PPC in quite visible and ugly way...
> Comparing an 8 bit value with ~0 does not work as expected.
> Replace ~0 by UINT8_MAX in comparison and also in assignment
> (and fix coding style, too).
>
> Cc: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de>
> ---
> hw/hpet.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/hpet.c b/hw/hpet.c
> index 0c80ee5..d5c406c 100644
> --- a/hw/hpet.c
> +++ b/hw/hpet.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ typedef struct HPETState {
> uint8_t hpet_id; /* instance id */
> } HPETState;
>
> -struct hpet_fw_config hpet_cfg = {.count = ~0};
> +struct hpet_fw_config hpet_cfg = {.count = UINT8_MAX};
>
> static uint32_t hpet_in_legacy_mode(HPETState *s)
> {
> @@ -682,8 +682,10 @@ static int hpet_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
> int i, iomemtype;
> HPETTimer *timer;
>
> - if (hpet_cfg.count == ~0) /* first instance */
> + if (hpet_cfg.count == UINT8_MAX) {
> + /* first instance */
> hpet_cfg.count = 0;
> + }
>
> if (hpet_cfg.count == 8) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Only 8 instances of HPET is allowed\n");
>
--
mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
