On 15/03/2016 17:31, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> On 15/03/2016 16:03, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/hw.h b/include/hw/hw.h
>>> index 2cb69d5..151d65e 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/hw.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/hw.h
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>>  #include "qemu/module.h"
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef NEED_CPU_H
>>> +#include "cpu.h"
>>>  #if TARGET_LONG_BITS == 64
>>>  #define qemu_put_betl qemu_put_be64
>>>  #define qemu_get_betl qemu_get_be64
>>
>> This actually makes things somewhat worse.  This dependency of hw/hw.h
>> on NEED_CPU_H should go away altogether.
>>
>> Would it be okay to stick to patches 1-13 for now?
> 
> Yes, as long as "for now" approximately means "until 2.7 opens up".
> 
> Proposed plan: I pursue 01-13 now, you rebase your need-cpu-h branch
> onto this work when it's ready, I rebase 14-15 onto yours, and carry on.
> Makes sense?

Yes, totally.  I've already started rebasing and there's nothing else
that sticks out.

Since I have your attention, what about getting rid of fprintf-fn.h and
moving it into qemu/osdep.h?

Paolo

Reply via email to