On 3 March 2016 at 14:45, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 25/02/2016 15:24, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Probably what happened >> was that when the API was being designed it started off with an >> 'unaligned' field, and then later the field name and semantics >> were changed but the docs weren't updated to match. My point was >> that just changing the name without looking at the behaviour we're >> actually implementing isn't correct. > > Peter, are you okay with adding your S-o-b and authorship to > this patch?
Yes. thanks -- PMM
