Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> writes:
> On 02/22/2016 07:59 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> + qemu_set_dfilter_ranges("0x1000+0x100");
>> +
>> + g_assert_false(qemu_log_in_addr_range(0xfff));
>> + g_assert(qemu_log_in_addr_range(0x1000));
>> + g_assert(qemu_log_in_addr_range(0x1100));
>
> This is exactly what I was talking about wrt off-by-one error in my first
> review -- 0x100 bytes, including 0x1000, finishes at 0x10ff.
>
> This third test should fail.
OK so should 0x100+0x0 fail as it makes no sense, 0 bytes from 0x100 start?
>
>
> r~
--
Alex Bennée
