On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:28:54PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 19 February 2016 at 20:04, Edgar E. Iglesias > <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > > > Switch to using isyn.swstep.ex to hold the is_ldex state for > > SWStep syndrome generation. > > > > No functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > What's the rationale for renaming the field? If this is groundwork > for something else it might make more sense in a patchset with > whatever is going to use this. Or is it just trying to make the > swstep handling parallel the dabt syndrome info approach a bit more?
Yes, the latter. I can drop this one... Cheers, Edgar
