On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/12/2010 06:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>Yes, but only for this line. What I mean is something more generic > >>like: > >> > >>"#"*) # comment > >> continue > >> ;; > >> > > > >IMO, that would only paper over suboptimally expressed patterns for the > >other line evaluations. > > Agreed. I like Jan's patch more. >
I have applied it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net