On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 09:45:32AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:10 +0000
>Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>>
>> This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/pci.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> index e66c47f..321423b 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
>> @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
>> }
>>
>> if (pread(fd, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl),
>> - vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_CAP_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
>> + vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
>> return -errno;
>> }
>>
>
>This is certainly trivial, I'll grab it for the respin of yesterday's
>pull request. Thanks,
Thanks Alex, have a nice weekend :-)
>
>Alex
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
