On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:10 +0000
Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>
> This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index e66c47f..321423b 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ static int vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> }
>
> if (pread(fd, &ctrl, sizeof(ctrl),
> - vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_CAP_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
> + vdev->config_offset + pos + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS) != sizeof(ctrl)) {
> return -errno;
> }
>
This is certainly trivial, I'll grab it for the respin of yesterday's
pull request. Thanks,
Alex
