On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote: > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it.
Yes. > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > discussion? I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qdev. Paolo
