On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On 02/11/2016 09:41 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > >>On 02/05/2016 09:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>>"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > >>> > >>>>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>>>>>You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel > >>>>>>who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. > >>>>> > >>>>>Yes. > >>>>> > >>>>>>For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > >>>>>>migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up > >>>>>>you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that > >>>>>>at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > >>>>>>discussion? > >>>>> > >>>>>I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for > >>>>>qdev. > >>>>> > >>>>>Paolo > >>>> > >>>>If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are > >>>>better than one. > >>> > >>>*If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together. > >>> > >> > >>No problem here from my point of view :) > > > >No problem to me, too. :) > > > >I am going to be away from work for 15 days starting on Tuesday > >Feb 16th. So if Marcel wants to start queueing patches already, > >please be my guest. I will be able to help on that after I'm > >back. > > > > Hi, > > If there are only a few patches on the mailing list, they can wait. > If the number will grow I'll send a pull request. > > So the MAINTAINER file should look like this, right? > > Regarding qdev, Andreas, I also think you are the most qualified > to take it, will you? > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2d6ee17..a86491a 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1200,6 +1200,13 @@ F: docs/*qmp-* > F: scripts/qmp/ > T: git git://repo.or.cz/qemu/armbru.git qapi-next > > +Machine
I believe it would be clearer if described as "Machine core", or "Common machine code". > +M: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > +M: Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> > +S: Supported > +F: hw/core/machine.c > +F: include/hw/boards.h > + > > > > Thanks, > Marcel Thanks! -- Eduardo
