On 11/12/15 01:11, David Gibson wrote: > The errors detected in this function indicate problems with the rest of > the machine type code, rather than configuration or runtime problems. > > Use error_setg() and &error_abort instead of explicit fprintf() and exit(). > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > --- > hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c > index 34b12a3..db4a675 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c > @@ -649,15 +649,14 @@ target_ulong spapr_rtas_call(PowerPCCPU *cpu, > sPAPRMachineState *spapr, > void spapr_rtas_register(int token, const char *name, spapr_rtas_fn fn) > { > if (!((token >= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE) && (token < RTAS_TOKEN_MAX))) { > - fprintf(stderr, "RTAS invalid token 0x%x\n", token); > - exit(1); > + error_setg(&error_abort, "RTAS invalid token 0x%x", token); > } > > token -= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE; > if (rtas_table[token].name) { > - fprintf(stderr, "RTAS call \"%s\" is registered already as 0x%x\n", > - rtas_table[token].name, token); > - exit(1); > + error_setg(&error_abort, > + "RTAS call \"%s\" is registered already as 0x%x", > + rtas_table[token].name, token); > }
As with the last patch, I also think these error_setg(&error_abort, ...) are rather ugly. Maybe use error_report() + abort() instead? Thomas