On 07/12/2015 06:20, Andrew Baumann wrote:
> Yeah, I considered doing that, but figured that those cases
> (incorrectly-sized register writes in 16-bit mode) are indicative of
> a pretty badly screwed-up guest, and was going for a minimal patch.
> It probably makes sense to change them for consistency, though.
I think those should be fixed by modifying lan9118_*_mem_ops and adding
.valid.{min,max}_access_size. Not for 2.5, however. (Probably these
patches should also be 2.6 + qemu-stable rather than 2.5).
Paolo
