On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:52:49AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 13.11.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > >> recent libnfs versions support logging debug messages. Add > >> support for it in qemu through an URL parameter. > >> > >> Example: > >> qemu -cdrom nfs://127.0.0.1/iso/my.iso?debug=2 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> > >> --- > >> v4->v5: add a comment in the code why we limit the debug level [Stefan] > >> v3->v4: revert to the initial version, but limit max debug level > >> v2->v3: use a per-drive option instead of a global one. [Stefan] > >> v1->v2: reworked patch to accept the debug level as a cmdline > >> parameter instead of an URI parameter [Stefan] > >> > >> block/nfs.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > Hi Peter, > > Please use my official maintainer email address <stefa...@redhat.com> > > when CCing me. I didn't spot the mail to GMail until after the QEMU 2.5 > > hard freeze deadline. > > Okay. I think I used that email because you replayed to earlier versions > of this Patch from your Gmail address. > > > > > Only bug fixes are being merged for QEMU 2.5 now. I'm sorry that this > > patch didn't make it. My block-next branch will be opening on Monday > > and I'll merge this patch there for QEMU 2.6. > > Thats not critical in this case. I think same applies for the ATAPI stuff > we worked on? There you used also your GMail account. Or can this > be treated as a bugfix?
The ATAPI patches go through John Snow. It's up to him whether they are considered a bug fix suitable for 2.5 or too risky. Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
