On 05/27/10 12:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:55:49PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> On 05/27/10 12:44, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:22:29PM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote: >>>> From: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com> >>>> >>>> Fix build failure introduced by 0bfcd599e3f5c5679cc7d0165a0a1822e2f60de2 >>>> >>>> The format statement expects unsigned long on x86_64, but receives >>>> unsigned long long, so gcc exits with an error. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com> >>> >>> I think this part of 0bfcd599e3f5c5679cc7d0165a0a1822e2f60de2 >>> should just be reverted. We have unsigned long, it should be printed >>> woith %ll. Casting to uint64_t just so we can print with PRIu64 seems silly. >> >> That is an option too. > > More importantly does this fix the problem for you?
Yes it works fine. Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com>
