On 23/10/15 19:02, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Stefan Hajnoczi (stefa...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:30:34PM +0200, Lluís Vilanova wrote: >>> Markus Armbruster writes: >>> >>>> Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> writes: >>> [...] >>>>> So, is there any agreement on what should be used? If so, could that >>>>> please be >>>>> added to CODING_STYLE? >>> >>>> I think HACKING would be a better fit. >>> >>> What about this? (at the end of HACKING) Feel free to add references to >>> other >>> functions you think are important. I'll send a patch once we agree on the >>> text. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lluis >>> >>> >>> 7. Error reporting >> >> Guest-triggerable errors should not terminate QEMU. There are plently >> of examples where this is violated today but there are good reasons to >> stop doing it. >> >> Denial of service cases: >> >> 1. If a guest userspace application is somehow able to trigger a QEMU >> abort, then an unprivileged guest application is able to bring down >> the whole VM. >> >> 2. If nested virtualization is used, it's possible that a nested guest >> can kill its parent, and thereby also kill its sibling VMs. >> >> 3. abort(3) is heavyweight if crash reporting/coredumps are enabled. A >> broken/malicious guest that keeps triggering abort(3) can be a big >> nuisance that consumes memory, disk, and CPU resources. >> >> Emulated hardware should behave the same way that physical hardware >> behaves. This may mean that the device becomes non-operational (ignores >> or fails new requests) until the next hard or soft reset. > > I'd add that if the QEMU detects that the guest has done something really > stupid and that the device is now dead until reset, then it should > output something diagnostic into the logs; otherwise everyone just > blames qemu and says it stopped (and I mean log, not trace - I want > to see this in the type of thing a users sends so that we have some > idea where to look immediately).
... and call qemu_system_guest_panicked() so that the management layers can flag the guest accordingly? Thomas