On 19/10/2015 15:17, Markus Armbruster wrote: > This is at least as much an argument for use of tracing as against it. > Tracing is a lot more flexible than log.h, and with the right backend, > it's much more efficient, too. > > If the appropriate trace patterns turn out to be too hard to remember, > we can provide canned trace patterns with names that are easy to > remember. > > -d could become sugar for a suitable trace patterns.
I think that's putting the cart a bit before the horse, since "-d" is currently not related to tracing at all. :) Paolo