On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:54:56PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: > >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Bump glib requirement to be able to use the GLIB_VERSION macros. > > > > We had a discussion about glib min version a few months back where it > > was decided 2.22 was the maximum we could use at the current time > > without us loosing support for certain platforms we care about. > > > > Simply being able to use the GLIB_VERSION macro does not seem like a > > compelling enough reason to re-vist this min version again right now, > > as I doubt we've changed our mind on what platforms we wish to target > > in the last couple of months. > > Fair enough, I couldn't find the discussion where 2.22 was decided to > be the maximum requirement, but SLES11 seems to be the reason then. > > What about just using the macro, but not bumping glib requirement?
It would be desirable - I think someone explored using the GLIB_VERSION macros before, without bumping version. I can't remember what the problem was that made them abandon that though - maybe someone else recalls... Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
