On 07/10/2015 14:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
> It is non-technical and called plagiarism.
I don't think the text
g_strdup_printf("-device ivshmem,shm=%s,size=1M",
(yes, even the final argument differs between your version and
Marc-André) counts as plagiarism.
> The common denominator is that
> every time this happens to me it's *@redhat.com.
Correlation does not imply causation. There is obvious overlap between
what Red Hat and SuSE care about. I have forgotten the specific episode
though. I remember I was CCed on a patch but had not replied to it, or
something like that.
Paolo
