Am 07.10.2015 um 14:16 schrieb Marc-André Lureau: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Am 06.10.2015 um 21:18 schrieb marcandre.lur...@redhat.com: >>> Marc-André Lureau (45): >> [...] >>> tests: add ivshmem qtest >> >> I had NAK'ed this patch in v1 and it has not been fixed. If this pull >> gets merged I will immediately revert it. Not funny. >> > > > Could stick to technical review, please. The test runs fine without kvm. > Regarding your copyright claim, I already explain that your older version of > boilerplate test is really nothing compare to this one. But if you feel so > strongly about it, I don't care you add a copyright line.
It is non-technical and called plagiarism. This is not about adding a copyright line to the file, it's about having a Signed-off-by on your patch. I had the same discussion with Paolo before, when he supposedly saw-but-not-read my patch. The common denominator is that every time this happens to me it's *@redhat.com. You were arguing that because your patch does more than mine you don't need to carry my copyright and Sob - that's an invalid argument given that even trivial refactoring changes by copyright holder IBM have been blocking our relicensing efforts. We chose not to define a threshold. Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
