On 8 September 2015 at 19:56, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Looks sensible to me. For patches 1 2 4..16 20
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
>
> Patches 3, 17, 19 I've sent "minor nit, otherwise r-by" followups to.
>
> Patch 18 is of course the meat of this series. It doesn't look
> obviously wrong but I want to put some more time into reviewing
> it tomorrow.

...and now I've sent the patch 18 review comments.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to