On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Frederic Konrad
> <fred.kon...@greensocs.com> wrote:
>> On 01/09/2015 22:58, Alistair Francis wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:17 AM, <fred.kon...@greensocs.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com>
>>>>
>>>> Seems this field is not needed.
>>>
>>> The commit message should be updated to represent the patch.
>>
>> Hmmm what do you mean?
>> It's not precise?
>
> Hey Fred,
>
> The commit message should make sense without the commit title.
>
So generally I let the diff speak for itself on trivials when
possible, that is you can reference the change (i.e. the diff) from
the commit message which I think was Freds intent here. I think that
rule of commit message self containment replies to flowing subject
line to commit message body.
But to address Alistair's comment, A fully self contained commit
message would be:
"
It seems the dev field of the I2CBus struct is not needed. Remove it.
"
Regards,
Peter
> Thanks,
>
> Alistair
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fred
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com>
>>>
>>> Otherwise:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alistair
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> hw/i2c/core.c | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/i2c/core.c b/hw/i2c/core.c
>>>> index 5a64026..e0f92de 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/i2c/core.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/i2c/core.c
>>>> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct I2CBus
>>>> {
>>>> BusState qbus;
>>>> I2CSlave *current_dev;
>>>> - I2CSlave *dev;
>>>> uint8_t saved_address;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
