On 28/08/2015 17:40, Peter Maydell wrote: > Don't we also need to use an atomic_rcu_read() for the load > pd = *lp; > (which is between hunk 1 and 2 in this patch) ?
Yes. Paolo
On 28/08/2015 17:40, Peter Maydell wrote: > Don't we also need to use an atomic_rcu_read() for the load > pd = *lp; > (which is between hunk 1 and 2 in this patch) ?
Yes. Paolo