On 28/08/2015 16:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 August 2015 at 17:40, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
From: KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com>

spinlock is only used in two cases:
   * cpu-exec.c: to protect TranslationBlock
   * mem_helper.c: for lock helper in target-i386 (which seems broken).

It's a pthread_mutex_t in user-mode so better using QemuMutex directly in this
case.
It allows as well to reuse tb_lock mutex of TBContext in case of multithread
TCG.
The line wrapping in this commit message (and the grammar) looks a bit off...

Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <fred.kon...@greensocs.com>
Message-Id: <1439220437-23957-5-git-send-email-fred.kon...@greensocs.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
  cpu-exec.c               | 15 +++------------
  include/exec/exec-all.h  |  4 ++--
  linux-user/main.c        |  6 +++---
  target-i386/cpu.h        |  3 +++
  target-i386/mem_helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
  target-i386/translate.c  |  2 ++
  tcg/tcg.h                |  4 ++++
  translate-all.c          | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  8 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
After this commit it looks like we have no users of spinlock_t
at all. It would be good to have a followup patch which deleted
include/exec/spinlock.h.

Seems Paolo forget to pick up the following patch from the mttcg tree:
"remove unused spinlock."
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg01129.html

Thanks,
Fred
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM


Reply via email to