On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 28 August 2015 at 16:46, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Two to go, moxie as the next one untested by Peter. > > The last email on qemu-devel from the moxie maintainer was > in 2013, so I wouldn't hold your breath. >
It is also unfortunately the only arch I couldn't get low effort test cases on. I can dig around to see if I can get a basic elf going to bring it up to same level of testing as other archs if we are really worried. Longer term though, maybe these homogeneous every-arch change patterns should only need a critical mass of acks from the arch maintainers for the whole thing to go through. It's unlikely that I botched moxie with most of the other arches reviewed, so chasing that ack from the last maintainer might not be needed. That or a generic reviewer should be able to ack ones like this, and it's almost candidate for trivial. Regards, Peter > -- PMM
