[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v0 2/3] spapr-rtas: Enable rtas_set_indicator() to return correct error

[Bharata B Rao]

drck->set_isolation_state() can return error. For such a case ensure
correct error is returned by rtas_set_indicator() instead of always
returning success.

TODO: rtas_st(, , uint32 val) => the return value uint32, but
drck->set_[allocation/indicator/isolation]_state() is returning int.
Should we change this return value to uint32_t to match with rtas_st()
argument ?

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
index e99e25f..96729b4 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static void rtas_set_indicator(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
     uint32_t sensor_state;
     sPAPRDRConnector *drc;
     sPAPRDRConnectorClass *drck;
+    int ret;
 
     if (nargs != 3 || nret != 1) {
         rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
@@ -413,19 +414,19 @@ static void rtas_set_indicator(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
                 spapr_ccs_remove(spapr, ccs);
             }
         }
-        drck->set_isolation_state(drc, sensor_state);
+        ret = drck->set_isolation_state(drc, sensor_state);
         break;
     case RTAS_SENSOR_TYPE_DR:
-        drck->set_indicator_state(drc, sensor_state);
+        ret = drck->set_indicator_state(drc, sensor_state);
         break;
     case RTAS_SENSOR_TYPE_ALLOCATION_STATE:
-        drck->set_allocation_state(drc, sensor_state);
+        ret = drck->set_allocation_state(drc, sensor_state);
         break;
     default:
         goto out_unimplemented;
     }
 
-    rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
+    rtas_st(rets, 0, ret);
     return;
 
 out_unimplemented:
-- 
2.1.0