On Thu, 08/06 11:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:33:26AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> > > > > --- > > Jan Kiszka, le Wed 29 Jul 2015 09:36:15 +0200, a écrit : > > > On 2015-07-29 00:12, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Jan Kiszka, le Mon 27 Jul 2015 15:33:27 +0200, a écrit : > > > >> Of course, I'm fine with handing this over to someone who'd like to > > > >> pick up. Do we have volunteers? > > > >> > > > >> Samuel, would you like to do this? As a subsystem maintainer, you are > > > >> already familiar with QEMU processes. > > > > > > > > I can help with maintenance, yes. > > > > > > "Help with" will easily mean "be the one and only". ;) > > > > Right, I understand that :) That's still preferable to have two contact > > people. > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 978b717..b506df5 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ F: scripts/qmp/ > > T: git git://repo.or.cz/qemu/armbru.git qapi-next > > > > SLIRP > > +M: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> > > M: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > S: Maintained > > F: slirp/ > > Please resend as a top-level email.
This email has proper subject, sign-off line and patch format, and the header doesn't have "In-reply-to". So it makes a legit patch. The quotes are below the "---" line so it should be read as complementary information and I think it is totally fine. At least patchew treats it so :) http://qemu.patchew.org/series/%3C20150806111014.GA6432%40type.bordeaux.inria.fr%3E Therefore, Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
