On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2015 09:47, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
>> I`ve mistyped lun for tgtd upon volume hotplug, which resulted in an
>> accidental crash, there is nothing but human factor. Until only LUN0
>> may possess such unusual properties, I`d vote to explicitly work it
>> around instead of adding generic protection from volumes with
>> advertized zero block size.
>
> It's only tgtd, as far as I know, that makes LUN0 special.  With lio
> (in-kernel target), for example, you can associate any kind of LUN to
> any LUN number.
>
> Paolo

It`s quite controversial point, for example take a look on
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/27/330. Anyway, if the lio does provide
storage on LUN0, my point from above is no longer valid, because I had
no references from quick googling confirming such a possibility.

Reply via email to