On 21 July 2015 at 15:09, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 21/07/2015 15:57, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 21 July 2015 at 14:47, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> So is the proposal here that we ship a non-upstream IPXE? >> That was less than entirely clear from the pull request... > > Well, it did say "This pull finally fixes the efi boot support. ipxe is > updated to the latest master, two non-upstream commits needed to make > efi work are added on top, and the build process is tweaked a bit".
Right, but if you want us to switch from "we just mirror upstream ipxe" to "we have our own ipxe" then it's probably better to start with that, rather than by submitting a pullreq that can't be applied until we switch our ipxe workflow. Do we really need this for 2.4, or can we wait and sort this out afterwards? It feels a bit late in the release cycle to start doing this kind of thing to me. -- PMM
