On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 06:07:40 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 June 2015 at 18:01, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I'm starting to wonder if the 32-bit ARM build system didn't have > > __NR_cacheflush defined in the system headers; that might explain some of > > the behavior. Could you check your system to see if it has > > __NR_cacheflush defined (try /usr/include/asm/unistd.h)? > > The constant name is __ARM_NR_cacheflush, not __NR_cacheflush > (all the ARM-specific syscalls are __ARM_NR_*). See > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h#L418
/me smacks his forehead Of course it is. We already work around that in arch-syscall-validate. D'oh! Good news though, I think we just found the bug ;) I'm currently trying to put out another fire in a different project; as soon as I've got that done I'll fix this. However, if somebody wants to play, I'm always happy to accept patches :) -- paul moore security @ redhat
