On 30 June 2015 at 18:01, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm starting to wonder if the 32-bit ARM build system didn't have > __NR_cacheflush defined in the system headers; that might explain some of the > behavior. Could you check your system to see if it has __NR_cacheflush > defined (try /usr/include/asm/unistd.h)?
The constant name is __ARM_NR_cacheflush, not __NR_cacheflush (all the ARM-specific syscalls are __ARM_NR_*). See http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h#L418 thanks -- PMM
