On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:30:56PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is
> > cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is cancelled so it's
> > not enough to check ret < 0.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/backup.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> > index 4a1af68..ddf8424 100644
> > --- a/block/backup.c
> > +++ b/block/backup.c
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque)
> >
> > if (job->sync_bitmap) {
> > BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm;
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (ret < 0 || block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) {
> > /* Merge the successor back into the parent, delete nothing. */
> > bm = bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap(bs, job->sync_bitmap, NULL);
> > assert(bm);
> >
>
> Didn't Jeff Cody already stage this?
Yes
