On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:33:25PM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:30:56PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > On 06/25/2015 08:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > Reclaim the dirty bitmap if an incremental backup block job is > > > cancelled. The ret variable may be 0 when the job is cancelled so it's > > > not enough to check ret < 0. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > block/backup.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c > > > index 4a1af68..ddf8424 100644 > > > --- a/block/backup.c > > > +++ b/block/backup.c > > > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque) > > > > > > if (job->sync_bitmap) { > > > BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm; > > > - if (ret < 0) { > > > + if (ret < 0 || block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) { > > > /* Merge the successor back into the parent, delete nothing. > > > */ > > > bm = bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap(bs, job->sync_bitmap, NULL); > > > assert(bm); > > > > > > > Didn't Jeff Cody already stage this? > > Yes
Thanks!
pgptbuGUfNM4G.pgp
Description: PGP signature