On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28:21PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > > > On 2015/6/10 22:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:38:24PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 2015/6/10 21:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:18:27PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > >>>>Ping? > >>>>Have these patches been missed? > >>> > >>>I see them upstream. See e.g. da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a. > >>>What's missing? > >>> > >> > >>da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a is "virtio-net: Move > >>DEFINE_VIRTIO_NET_FEATURES to virtio-net", not this patchset. > > > >Oh right, I just saw Cornelia sent a minor comment which wasn't > >addressed. > > > Yeah, and I ask whether it needs to repin. Could you help deal the > indentations?
Sorry I can't. Too many patches flying around, trying to make 2.4. > >Also, I'd rather this is rebased on top of Gerd's virtio 1 tree - > >I plan to merge them today. > > > > I pull master, apply Gerd's virtio-1 patchset "[PATCH 00/33] virtio 1.0 > patch series rebased", then apply these patches. No conflicts and compile > pass. I guess you could apply these directly. > > PS: The [PATCH 01/33] of Gerd's virtio-1 patchset is already in master. Thanks. > Thanks, > > -- > Shannon
