On 06/04/2015 01:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2015 08:19, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> This is a required step to implement read_with_attrs and write_with_attrs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 96
>>> ++++++-------------------------------------------
>>
>> Nice stats.
>>
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>>> index 7507a15..0b3667a 100644
>>> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>>> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>>> @@ -650,101 +650,25 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl, hwaddr
>>> offset,
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> -static uint32_t pflash_readb_be(void *opaque, hwaddr addr)
>>> -{
>>> - return pflash_read(opaque, addr, 1, 1);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static uint32_t pflash_readb_le(void *opaque, hwaddr addr)
>>> -{
>>> - return pflash_read(opaque, addr, 1, 0);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static uint32_t pflash_readw_be(void *opaque, hwaddr addr)
>>> +static uint64_t pflash_mem_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned len)
>>> {
>>> pflash_t *pfl = opaque;
>>> + bool be = !!(pfl->features & (1 << PFLASH_BE));
>>
>> !!() not needed. Otherwise
>
> I don't like magic bool-ification...
I don't like !! just as much. If you don't like implicit conversion, then use
!= 0.
> Is there a coding style item that
> forbids this idiom in bool assignments?
No. Indeed, nothing in coding style about bool at all.
r~
