On 06/09/2015 04:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:42AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able to >>>> override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series implements >>>> this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it. >>>>
>>> Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c). >> >> It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-) > > For sanity, can you check whether you are on the CC list in Max's second > ping message: 556f5a4d.50...@redhat.com? > > I had another CC mix-up recently and want to check whether my mail tools > are dropping CCs or if it's just me being confused. mailman has an (extremely annoying, in my opinion) habit of munging cc: lines to drop the name of any recipient who has set their list delivery options to avoid duplicate messages where the recipient is in cc. Ultimately, the end user still gets the messages (reply-to-all gets the message back to the list, even though it drops the cc), but at the expense of not directly going to the inbox as desired. At least I still only get one copy of the message, but yes, I'd rather have that one copy come directly to me for all messages in the thread, rather than through the list because I was munged out of cc. I hope that mailman3/hyperkitty will have saner defaults and not munge cc lists to exclude subscribers merely based on their preference on duplicate mail receipt. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
