On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:42AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able to > > > override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series implements > > > this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it. > > > > > > > > > v2 (rebase on current master): > > > - Patch 1: Conflict in iotest 051's reference output (in a line that is > > > removed by this patch anyway) > > > > > > > > > git-backport-diff against v1: > > > > > > Key: > > > [----] : patches are identical > > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream > > > patch > > > [down] : patch is downstream-only > > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, > > > respectively > > > > > > 001/2:[0002] [FC] 'block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()' > > > 002/2:[----] [-C] 'iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL' > > > > > > > > > Max Reitz (2): > > > block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open() > > > iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL > > > > > > block.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > tests/qemu-iotests/051 | 1 - > > > tests/qemu-iotests/051.out | 3 --- > > > tests/qemu-iotests/119 | 60 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/119.out | 11 ++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/120 | 65 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/120.out | 15 +++++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/group | 2 ++ > > > 8 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/119 > > > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/119.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/120 > > > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/120.out > > > > Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c). > > It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-)
For sanity, can you check whether you are on the CC list in Max's second ping message: 556f5a4d.50...@redhat.com? I had another CC mix-up recently and want to check whether my mail tools are dropping CCs or if it's just me being confused. Thanks, Stefan
pgpSSYNqvkwu6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
