On 4 June 2015 at 10:44, Pavel Fedin <p.fe...@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> I think if I were you I would just include this patch in the same series >> as the code it's intended to support. > > The code it's intended to support waits for GICv3 itself, that's > why it's delayed. And this part has no dependencies and could be > applied to master. IMHO partial progress is better than no progress. > But it's just IMHO. So, OK, if you think it has to wait, it can wait.
If it were a larger amount of code it might make sense to apply it early (as we've been doing with some EL2/EL3 preparatory work). But it's only a single patch, and it doesn't provide any immediate benefit, so there's no need to try to review it out of context, I think. thanks -- PMM
