Hi! > I think if I were you I would just include this patch in the same series > as the code it's intended to support.
The code it's intended to support waits for GICv3 itself, that's why it's delayed. And this part has no dependencies and could be applied to master. IMHO partial progress is better than no progress. But it's just IMHO. So, OK, if you think it has to wait, it can wait. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
