Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote: > Am 21.04.2010 17:08, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> A different status that disallows cont sounds good. But exit() would > work for me as well and is probably easier. However, I'm not sure if it > would work well for management. I think that management would prefer it. It is developers who try to loadvm several times on the same machine. For management, if loadvm fails, having to restart qemu is the less of its problems, they already have infrastructure to kill process and rerun (probably with something tweeaked). >> Defining the right behavior and deciding what to expose have been >> proven very difficult tasks in the QMP world. > > There's nothing QMP specific about it. The problem has always been > there, QMP just means that you involuntarily get to review all of it. And we are thankful for the review :) Later, Juan.
