On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:38:32 -0300
"Paulo Alcantara" <pca...@zytor.com> wrote:
> On Mon, June 1, 2015 6:05 am, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 31/05/2015 00:04, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> >> + case TCO_RLD:
> >> + tr->timeouts_no = 0;
> >> + if (can_start_tco_timer(tr)) {
> >> + tr->tco.rld = tr->tco.tmr;
> >> + tco_timer_reload(tr);
> >> + } else {
> >> + tr->tco.rld = val;
> >
> > Please mask out bits outside TCO_RLD_MASK here, same as you do for
> > TCO1_STS_MASK and friends.
>
> OK.
Hrm - actually, I can't do that. Unlike TCO1_STS, TCO2_STS and TCO1_CNT
registers that have some bits which are disabled by writing 1 to them
-- that's why I mask them out before updating -- the TCO_RLD and
TCO_TMR registers only have bits 15:10 marked as _reserved_ and I
should not zero them out. Does that seem correct to you?
Thanks,
Paulo
--
Paulo Alcantara, C.E.S.A.R
Speaking for myself only.
