malc a écrit :
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:32PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
>>> OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
>>>
>>> 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
>>>    6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3
>>>
>>> 2. oss: fix fragment setting
>>>    3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4b519c3562
>>>
>>> 3. Workaround for broken OSS_GETVERSION on FreeBSD, part two
>>>    72ff25e4e98d6dba9286d032b9ff5432553bbad5
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock <n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
>> I would actually prefer a patch series instead of a cumulative patch, so
>> that we can match commits between HEAD and stable-0.12.
>>
>> Also malc, do you have any comment on that?
> 
> I don't get this: what is that i need to comment on? The patches were
> commited to master, so i don't have anything against them.
> 

Do you think they are fine to commit to stable, do they really fixes
important bugs there?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply via email to