On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > malc a ?crit : > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:32PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > >>> As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs > >>> OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits: > >>> > >>> 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed > >>> 6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3 > >>> > >>> 2. oss: fix fragment setting > >>> 3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4b519c3562 > >>> > >>> 3. Workaround for broken OSS_GETVERSION on FreeBSD, part two > >>> 72ff25e4e98d6dba9286d032b9ff5432553bbad5 > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock <n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de> > >> I would actually prefer a patch series instead of a cumulative patch, so > >> that we can match commits between HEAD and stable-0.12. > >> > >> Also malc, do you have any comment on that? > > > > I don't get this: what is that i need to comment on? The patches were > > commited to master, so i don't have anything against them. > > > > Do you think they are fine to commit to stable, do they really fixes > important bugs there? >
Yes. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
